Showing posts with label gallery. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gallery. Show all posts

Sunday, 27 January 2013

11: Fiction is stranger than truth at Somerset House this January

Cartier-Bresson: A Question of Colour
Tim Walker: Story Teller
Somerset House, Strand, London, WC2R 1LA
www.somersethouse.org.uk
Visited on Sunday 27 January 2013


There is something pleasing about the fact that while the culturecake project was devised to fill up my time following my departure from the Somerset House-headquartered National Youth Orchestra, the first cultural visit post-‘sabbatical’ actually brought me back to that very same location, for two free photography exhibitions – Cartier-Bresson: A Question of Colour and Tim Walker: Story Teller.

The courtyard at Somerset House
Somerset House is in interesting place to visit in itself. It was built in the 1790s, on the site of an old Tudor palace, and was intended to provide accommodation for the Royal Academy of Arts, the Royal Society, and the Society of Antiquaries, as well as various government offices and the Navy Board. The instruction to the architect was to create a building that would be "an ornament to the Metropolis and a monument of the taste and elegance of His Majesty's Reign". Originally the building could be accessed directly by boat from the Thames – a requirement of the Navy Board who needed to be able to travel to the dockyards at Greenwich. However, with the construction of the Victoria Embankment in the 1860s – a scheme which provided a useful new road next to the river, but whose literally underlying purpose was to create a much-needed sewerage system for the city and its burgeoning population – much of this was subsumed, and all that remains of the grand river entrances today is a central arch and the aptly-named West Water Gate (essentially, the tradesman’s entrance to the building, known by those who work there as Charmain’s Passage, after the utterly humourless security lady who guards it from within her little booth, as Brother Neil and Charlie will attest).

As it was in the early 1800s

The central quadrangle is still an absolutely splendid courtyard, though it’s often filled with temporary constructions such as the ice-skating rink round Christmas time, and accommodation for the twice-yearly hipster-and-fashionista fest that is London Fashion Week. Today, happily, it was empty and in the lovely Sunday morning sunshine it looked particularly grand.

After a rendezvous in the Seamen’s Hall, we began with the Cartier-Bresson exhibition. I learned from the information on the wall that Henri Cartier-Bresson is acknowledged as one of the 20th century’s greatest photographers, and is noted particularly for images that capture life ‘on the fly’ – that is, photos that preserve for future and lengthy consideration fleeting 'decisive moments' of order within apparent chaos. He worked almost exclusively in black and white, believing that colour would detract from the inherent power of a photo. The curator of this exhibition (one William A. Ewing) has chosen to display ten of his pieces that have never before been exhibited in the UK alongside colour photographs from more recent photographic artists who share Cartier-Bresson's fascination with this 'decisive moment’. I guess the idea is to see whether Cartier-Bresson’s idea that colour dilutes the power is really true.

I love this kind of photography because mostly the subject matter is ordinary and everyday – a man crossing a road, the reflection of a car in a bus shelter, a group of kids playing in the street. What’s captured in the photo is a moment that barely existed, one that would pass so quickly you might simply not notice it. Often such a moment is ‘decisive’ owing to the composition – for one fleeting moment, the man’s head in the foreground is perfectly in the middle of the arm of that construction crane on the site in the background, for example. The photo records the moment for us to consider and be delighted by, all the more so because we know that the very next second after the shutter closed, it simply wasn’t there any more. (Those idents for Channel 4 play on this exact theory – bundled blocks of hay float apparently randomly in the air, but as the camera moves left to right, for a split second they align to form the figure ‘4’, then the moment is gone and they are random floating blocks again).

The 'question of colour' is, I think, rather easily answered. Cartier-Bresson's black and whites are certainly powerful, but the others are no less so. I felt that their potency was if anything enhanced by their bold and vibrant colours. Moreover, many of the decisive moments in these photographs wouldn’t have existed if the image had just been black and white – for example a lovely one taken at a zebra crossing featured a man holding an orange in his hand that was at exactly the same level, and was exactly the same colour, as a dustcart left beside the pavement. It was a cute moment, pretty much insignificant in terms of its actual subject, and captured by more by luck than judgment - but the presence of colour was the thing that gave it its artistic impact. Though some shots were more appealing than others, generally this was a fascinating and delightful collection of split seconds from the 20th century that left me feeling very grateful to the photographers for bothering to capture them. Very much worth seeing.

The rooms in the South Building of Somerset House have beautiful marquetry floors, high ceilings and large windows, and as such form very pleasant, airy spaces in which to display art. As a viewer, you feel like you're strolling around a stately home, and the things you're looking at are clearly presented. Of course the space in a gallery can be used much more imaginatively, as we found with the Tim Walker exhibition, which brings to life his photographs in a vivid and almost confrontational way.

We entered the first room to find the tail fin and fuselage of what seemed to be a real Spitfire, the two pieces attached to opposite sides of the room. The descriptive information on the wall, written by the photographer himself, began very high up and descended in a curve - appropriate typesetting for the effusive and emotional wording. Some photographs were hanging on the walls, but many were displayed within shallow wooden cases set in ‘islands’ in the middle of each room and made, I suppose, to look like the kind of hay stuffing-filled boxes you might use to transport artworks around. We soon realised that the Spitfire was a prop used in several of that room’s photos, and this idea of displaying the props alongside the photos that feature them continued throughout the exhibition. Interesting.

Tim Walker’s work will be very familiar to readers of magazines such as Vogue and Vanity Fair. His fashion shoots go far beyond the depiction of models wearing particular clothes - they are hugely lavish, super-contrived stories in themselves. You can hardly even imagine how much effort must have gone into the shoot for each image, not least on the part of the photographer, who clearly has an enormously fertile imagination. The props, clothing, lighting, composition and post work have all been considered in minute detail, and executed with extreme care, in order to give the most robust support possible to the subject – and every single image in this collection packs an enormous punch.

In each room there was piece of flamboyant blurb on the wall from Mr Walker, outlining his thoughts and ambitions in creating the images, and laid out in a typographically quirky fashion. The images themselves depict improbable or impossible but hugely desirable scenes, where people, poses, colour and objects come together in an almost inexplicably alluring way. They couldn’t be more different in what they achieve artistically from those in the Cartier-Bresson exhibition, which are appealing owing to their serendipitous truth. Here, truth is banished with childlike glee and abandon. These images come straight from the artist’s imagination and connect with yours in a delicious visual conspiracy. Some of it is creepy – the oversized snail props on the walls, for example, or the disturbingly huge and slightly malevolent-looking doll – but mostly it’s playful, and saturated with delight in its own fantastical, fairytale world. Here are some examples of what I mean, and much more can be seen on his website:


Like a nursery rhyme come to life

Smouldering

Fairy-mong

Quirky-creepy

Clever, and funny

Beautiful and aaaaaaaaargh at the same time

Possibly the most captivating image in the exhibition

(Not in the exhibition - this is a self-portrait of the photographer)

That photo provides a rather nice segue to the baked goods part of the report. We took coffee and cake in Tom’s Deli, located just off the Seamen’s Hall. It’s not bad in there. They make a lot of effort to display the impressive selection of cakes nicely, though they’re not afraid to charge for it – two coffees and a brownie came to £7.50. Said brownie was particularly fine however – slab-like in proportions, with a wonderfully crunchy top that gave way under only slight pressure to allow the (regrettably plastic) fork to sink into a good inch of chocolate-y deliciousness. It was a 9 out of 10.

Damn pricey postcard!

All in all, I’d highly recommend both these exhibitions, particularly as they are free. The only real negative is that the Rizzoli Bookshop is shockingly over-priced and they only have a choice of three postcards on offer from the exhibitions, priced at £2.50 each! I bought one anyway. Somerset House is also worth a visit – though I think it’s best in the summer when you can go via Tesco on the Strand and pick up a bottle of wine for consumption on the lovely terrace that overlooks the Thames.


Monday, 7 January 2013

8: Saatchi Gallery


King's Road, Chelsea, London, Greater London SW3 4RY
www.saatchi-gallery.co.uk
Visited on Friday 4 January 2013

Today’s journey began in Dalston as I was there for an appointment, and so I was able to get straight on the Overground to Whitechapel and change for the District Line to Sloane Square. It was a pleasant journey, taking me unexpectedly round the back of the previously visited Geffrye Museum, and thus affording a very quick look at the gardens there (nice but bare, it being winter). There was virtually nobody on the train and I got to the destination in about 30 minutes. If you don’t live in London be warned – this is in no way typical of a journey on either of those lines!

The Saatchi Gallery began life in 1985 in St John’s Wood. Opened by renowned recluse, ad man and art aficionado Charles Saatchi in order to show his private collection to the public, it has received and indeed courted quite a bit of controversy over the years. Saatchi effectively launched the career of Damien Hirst, when he put on his famous show of Young British Artists in the early 1990s (featuring Hirst’s shark in formaldehyde piece), and provided a springboard for many others such as Rachel Whiteread, Jake and Dinos Chapman, Sarah Lucas and Tracey Emin. Her piece ‘Everyone I Have Ever Slept With 1963-95’ (‘the tent’) was lost in a fire at a storage warehouse in Leyton containing several other pieces owned by Saatchi, as well as many other artworks. The total loss was valued by one insurance specialist at over £50m. Indeed.

Anyway, the gallery now has its premises within the very splendid Duke of York’s HQ. Done up for the purpose and opened in 2008 it is undoubtedly one of the best gallery spaces I have been to. The fifteen white-walled and high-ceilinged rooms are light and airy and provide a serious but quite neutral context for the artworks displayed in them. Unlike other modern art galleries (such as the Tate Modern), where you have to pay to see the special exhibitions, everything here is free – except for the little exhibition guidebook, which maddeningly I seem to have mislaid somewhere between lunch and home (that’s what daytime wine does for you kids – just say no). Anyway it was only £1. There was a stack of free copies of the gallery’s own magazine ‘Art and Music’ in the foyer so I had a flip through one of those while awaiting today’s companion, the Lady Anonymous…

Dramatic entrance

There were two exhibitions for us to see - ‘Gaiety is the most outstanding feature of the Soviet Union’, and ‘Breaking the Ice: Moscow art 1960-80s’. Together the two bring together works by about 40 Russian artists and we saw many pieces, so I will just give some of the highlights here.

The first gallery contained large black and white photographs of Soviet prisoners. They were all men, stripped to the waist (and beyond in some cases) to reveal their tattoos. The photographer, Sergei Vasiliev, had worked for a local newspaper, then got a job as a prison warden. His colleague had begun cataloguing the prisoners’ tattoos as the imagery contained subversive messages about the Soviet regime, and about the prisoners’ own crimes. When the KGB got wind of this, they realized that these DIY tattoos – made using improvised sharp edges and ‘ink’ in the form of blood or urine – could provide useful information, and so they sent in Vasiliev to make a visual document. The photos are immediately striking because the men have been quite deliberately posed – sometimes on their own with props, sometimes seated in pairs or groups with their arms over each other’s shoulders in comradely fashion, and sometimes looking directly at the camera with a very intimidating stare – these are portraits rather than merely technical pictures. The tattoos themselves are surprisingly intricate and well-executed, given the tools available. They are mostly images, though there are some words too – we couldn’t make out much of this as they use the Cyrillic alphabet, but there was a bit of Latin I did recognise on one of the men: Dum Spiro Spero, which means ‘While I breathe, I hope’. (In one episode of the BBC drama series Spooks, the character Lucas North returns from seven years in a Russian prison, where he had also been tattooed with this motto).

Don't mess
 
Moving on, we came to a room containing a line of what looked like cubicles or stables made from cardboard. Inside each one was a dummy of a man wearing suit trousers and business shoes, but his head was a colourful abstract shape, and his shirt was filthy and ripped. Each man had a different injury but all were brutal – arms missing, or a hand ripped off and pinned to the wall. The figures were cartoony enough not to be disturbingly gruesome, but also real enough to be quite unsettling. The artist, Gosha Ostretsov, is apparently a big fan of comics, which, we learned, ‘have not been assimilated into Russian art in the same way as they were by Pop artists in the West. In fact, they are still considered somewhat alien and certainly not the medium with which to convey anything serious. Ostretsov has knowingly subverted this received idea by co-opting the resistance to comics and pop culture, using them as a colourful, mass culture form “[to polemicize] with the profound, rather heavy-handed conceptualist approach”'. Sure. Quite good though.

Criminal Government - Cell 999
Kind of grim, really

Vikenti Nilin’s ‘From the Neighbours’ series of photos was one of my favourites in the exhibition. The shots feature ordinary people seating on windowsills in desolate-looking high rise apartment blocks, but with their legs on the outside, as if they might jump at any moment. The buildings and clothes are drab, but, despite their precarious positions, the people are passive in this potential suicide situation, which I think is the point the artist is trying to make. You might joke that living in one of these utterly commonplace, totally uninspiring Soviet block of flats might make you want to top yourself, but these people seem to have no drive to do anything, not even that – they are bored, uninterested, slightly unimpressed. It’s a simple concept I suppose, but the I found the message affectingly direct, and the camera angles and composition gave me that same feeling you get when you're close to the edge of high cliff.

From the Neighbours Series
Suicidal, or just bored?
 
In the next room we came across some lovely paintings. They were mainly large cavasses, with very small, ghostly figures gently positioned in the middle. They had an ethereal quality to them and were plain creepy too in a way – they compelled you to look, but the figures depicted were reminiscent of something that might be in a dream at that point when you know it’s going to accelerate into a nightmare. It made me shudder a bit, but I couldn’t help looking.

Untitled
Spooky but lovely

By far the most disturbing set of pieces – but in a way my favourite part of the whole exhibition - was a series of photographs by Boris Mikhailov, showing homeless people in the Ukraine. It was stark and direct. The people are known as ‘bomzhes’ – those who have no home or support. The artist states that he wanted to capture them while they still were ‘normal’ and still looked human. The implication that they were changing into something less-than-human owing to their appalling living conditions and alienation from society was deeply depressing. Many of the people were posed naked or half-naked and there were a lot of unpleasant genitals on show. Most of the subjects were looking directly at the camera, and the expressions on their faces were in some ways unfathomable, but in another way quite simple – accusatory and pleading. As viewers we felt almost guilty, as if we were the ones who’d put these people in this destitute position. The sexual poses were quite hard to deal with, perhaps because it was a difficult reminder that these people are indeed still human, and still have the same basic drives that we all do. 

Case History
Totally massive sure right here

The next gallery was a bit of a surprise as it seemed to be art from Hong Kong, therefore not part of the exhibition we were working our way around. We had a look anyway, and I particularly enjoyed the enormous wooden tank. Sure was also a fan of this item but there were too many people around to get a decent shot of him with it.

Bonus tank
 
On the top floor we found the Breaking the Ice: Moscow art 1960-80s, which contained some really interesting pieces, although we were pretty hungry by this point, so we skipped over quite a bit of it. Nonetheless, we did spend quite a bit of time looking at the series of paintings and lovely little illustrations by Viktor Pivoravov and the impressively large works of [did not write down and thus don’t know artist’s name!].

Good space

Nice letter-y thing

Pivovarov's 'Black apple'

Stalin meets Giacometti

Ironic

After all that it was time for lunch, so we decided to try out the rather posh-looking ‘Gallery Mess’ restaurant, which is situated just next to the exhibition space. This was something of an extravagance as it was not cheap, but we felt we ought to treat ourselves, since we had quite bit of catching up to do, and it was a Friday. So, any excuse really.

Very pleasant restaurant space
Look at that VERY BIG SHOE Mummy. (only one person reading this will get that joke)

Somewhat extravagant lunch

Salmon fishcake on wilted spinach (Lady Anonymous)
‘It’s good. Pretty tasty. I guess fishcakes are quite a boring thing to choose, but it suits my needs at this time. The crumb-to-filling and fish-to-potato ratios are perfect, and the spinach is excellent. Frankly this is one of the best fishcakes I’ve ever had and I’m going to give it a 10.’

Duck breast with lentils and pesto (thepateface)
‘This is super-delicious and the pesto is a stroke of genius. I’m loving this thin and elegant cutlery. Probably didn’t need quite so many lentils but there are some bits of something very tasty mixed in, which I am enjoying immensely. Portion size is exactly right. 9.5 out of 10.’

The high marks do reflect the price we paid, but we enjoyed very nice service and overall the atmosphere in there was very pleasant – light and airy like the gallery, with some added super posh people having a conversation worth eavesdropping upon at the next table (“Well I said to him, if you insist on slumming it then go ahead and move to N16, but know that I don’t approve of this’). Charming. A slight air of condescension was detectable in the waiter later on, but that might have been because we were still there at 4.30pm, taking our dessert in the form of red wine.

On the whole it was a lovely day out. I’d very much recommend the Saatchi Gallery in general, and particularly the two exhibitions we saw. Though there is a lot in there that’s just nice or intriguing to look at, there is some tough stuff as well, so I’d say go along if you want a little bit of a challenge. And that restaurant is certainly worth dipping into your savings for!

Thursday, 6 December 2012

5: 'Death: A self-portrait' at the Wellcome Collection

183 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE
www.wellcomecollection.org
Visited on Thursday 6 December 2012


No time for fancy-dan multiple-bus routes today – I was running late for the rendezvous at Euston station with MinusTheMatt, owing to becoming far too absorbed in other project work (making Christmas tree decorations – hm is it a stretch to call that ‘project work’?!). Anyway, suffice it to say, the train from Clapton to Walthamstow and then Victoria line tube to Euston is the quickest route and is quite boring, but I arrived in time to smash a quick whopper meal at Burger King (not my classiest start to a culturecake excursion) and soon we were ready to head over to the Wellcome Collection for the exhibition ‘Death: A self-portrait’.

One great thing about this gallery is that it’s free to go to the permanent collections and all special exhibitions. Another great thing is the facial hair of the founder, Henry Wellcome (1853 – 1936). He was a pharmacist, entrepreneur and philanthropist who amassed a collection of over one million medical items during his lifetime. The Wellcome Building on Euston Road houses the Wellcome Collection, one of three galleries dedicated to this magnificently moustachioed man’s original vision, and its rather pleasing strapline reads ‘The free destination for the incurably curious’. Right up my street then.


Very wise words

‘Death: A self-portrait’ comprises items from the collection of Richard Harris, a former antique print dealer from Chicago, and is devoted to his fascination with our complex and contradictory attitudes towards death. The five rooms were dimly lit, with spotlights strategically positioned to throw eerie shadows on the walls. Throughout, we could hear the murmurings of an interview on repeat being shown on the TV in the final room, featuring Mr Harris himself talking about what inspired him to bring these pieces together. I was very pleased with the free booklet that provides a guide to the exhibition, designed almost in the manner of a funeral order of service book.

Nice, and informative, free thing

Through paintings, sculptures, photographs and drawings from a wide range of artists and ordinary people, Harris took us on a journey through the big philosophical concepts concerning death and dying. We began with a series of vanitas paintings – which I learned is a particular type of symbolic still life from the 16th and 17th centuries, intended to remind the viewer of the transient nature of life on earth. They often include a human skull, juxtaposed with things that we might treasure (money, ornaments, jewellery) or ephemeral items like cut flowers. The message is clear – pretty or ‘valuable’ things last a short time, but death lasts forever. This reminded me of a great verse from the Bible (I once read the whole of the Old Testament) (yes, I know) – ‘No matter how long you live, remember you will be dead much longer’ (Ecclesiastes 11:8). Ecclesiastes was apparently written by ‘The Philosopher’, a man who didn’t really understand the ways of God but gave sensible advice on working hard and enjoying life as best you can given that there isn’t so much of it. It was the most interesting book in the Bible I thought, apart from the ones I knew from the New Testament with the Nativity stories, which are pretty heart-warming.

Anyway, moving on to the second room, we found a series of pieces concerned with the inevitability of death. The notion of the Danse Macabre appeared from the late Medieval period onwards, when Europe was ravaged by wars, famines and plagues. It was represented in all sorts of art, including music, painting and sculpture, and addresses the idea that death is the great leveller – it comes to everyone whether they are popes or paupers, peasants or kings, women or men – but it’s also something of a reveller too. Here were paintings showing skeletons and corpses cavorting with the living, perhaps to remind people that frivolous dancing and self-indulgent behaviour brings you closer to The End. They also offered a humorous perspective and reflected on the absurdity of life. One piece we particularly liked in this room was a little tin and wire sculpture of a skeleton sitting on a table, looking like he was just taking a breather from the party. The works here certainly showed death as something that could be our friend as much as our enemy – whatever the case, it is ever-present and ineluctable.

The third room contained some quite difficult drawings by Goya showing death brought about by war. They are hard to look at not so much because they show dead bodies, but because they show them in such a way that your imagination can’t help supplying the narrative immediately prior to the moment that’s been depicted. The bodies themselves are limp and motionless, but they’ve been brought to that point through horrible violence. A bit depressing.

The fourth room was very interesting, containing a variety of pieces focusing on what Freud described as the ‘eternal conflict at the centre of human civilisation: the instinct towards life and towards destruction’. Many of the works here were both repellent and compelling at the same time. One painting showing a skeleton in an unmistakably sensual pose with a woman was disturbing somehow and yet I couldn’t help looking at it. In the middle of the room was a realistic sculpture of about half a human body – it was missing one leg from the thigh downwards, as well as its bottom jaw and one of its arms. From behind it looked like a man sitting up, but from the front it was a shocking and rather gruesome representation of a human torn apart. Tough stuff!

The final room featured a wide range of pieces focusing on commemoration. It is clear that whatever culture we belong to, we like to feel connected to those who have already died while we ourselves are still alive. There were Tibetan ceremonial bowls from the 1600s made out of human skulls, and photos of modern-day Mexicans posing with wreaths made out of marigolds as part of their Day of the Dead rituals. The items I liked the most were a series of photos taken by anonymous ordinary people, showing groups of the living posing with macabre props such as skeletons or skulls. One of these showed a bunch of what could have been anatomy students with a skeleton, in whose mouth they’d placed a cigar, which was being lit by a leery-looking young man. The photo was dated 1918 – which means that probably all the people in the shot are now as dead as the prop…

After all this, we came to the kind of exit room, on the wall of which there was a huge infographic, specially commissioned from David McCandless. He’s the author and designer of an excellent book called Information is Beautiful, which Brother B Man the Mystic bought me for Christmas a couple of years ago, and which contains graphic representations of all sorts of interesting stats. This one showed the approximate number of people to have died from all the various causes since records began. Cancer and disease were the main culprits – war, jellyfish, Chlamydia and philosophy less so. Interesting. Though perhaps not as interesting as the google search I just did to check ‘is cancer a disease’, as I was unsure as to its medical classification. Hilarious what google thought I might have been looking for, based on me entering the word ‘is’ into the search bar!

The X Factor PR team are all over this issue I'm sure

OK enough of all the death and dying and onto the very live subject of CAKES. I had been advised that the café here is ‘amazing’, but I am afraid to say that we did not find this to be the case (sorry Brother Neil). In its defence, it has a wonderful set of lights above the seating area, which contains nice tables and retro-styled chairs. It’s situated in the entrance hall area of the building and is united in open-plan fashion with the shop, so you can scope out your goods while sipping your tea. Good.

Good lights

Cake with your cellophane?

Not home made

MinusTheMatt opted for a slightly off-programme food selection of pie and beer, while I went for the traditional latte and tart. At £13, this was the cheapest refreshment run of the project so far, but as MTM axiomatically observed: you get what you pay for in this life…

Pork pie with piccalilli and a bottle of Budvar (MinusTheMatt)
“The pastry-to-filling ratio is a bit off. The meat part is not spicy at all, in fact this is the blandest pork pie I’ve ever had in my life. Well below average. I’m going to say this is a 4.5 out of 10. The beer? Well, it’s beer, so yeah fine.”

Treacle tart with latte
“The mug is quite a nice shape, but the coffee tastes a bit machiney. In fact this whole thing has the air of production-line rather than homemade. I am suspicious of the fact that many of the cakes are individually wrapped in cellophane and that the people serving are a bit obsessive about the use of latex gloves. The texture of the tart is a bit claggy, and the whole thing tastes more of lemon than treacle. It’s poor, but I’m hungry so I’ll eat it anyway. Still, 4.5 is the most I can give this.”

The fact that there were no napkins and no forks, added to the above, meant that we were a bit disappointed with the whole café experience. The shop, however, which is in fact a branch of Blackwell’s, was pretty good. I bought the card pictured above showing Henry Wellcome, plus two books – one called ‘Death’ by Geoffrey Scarre, which is about the philosophical questions raised by death, and one called ‘Immortality’ by one of my favourite novelists, Milan Kundera. Good goods.

Apologies for the small number of photos in this post – there were several very clear signs up in the exhibition saying that photography was not allowed. I did get Sure out of my pocket once or twice to look at things, but he didn’t have too much to say.

All in all ‘Death: A self-portrait’ was quite good, but I’m not sure I would really recommend it as a brilliant exhibition to go to. It was certainly thought-provoking, but you could probably just look up ‘images of death’ online if you’re interested and that would get you thinking just as much. I do rate the gallery as a whole though, and there is a lot more to see than the one thing we went too. The fact that it’s totally free is excellent, and I was very pleased with my rather nice booklet.